Author
|
Topic: History of Human Space Flight (Ted Spitzmiller)
|
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 09-19-2016 09:24 AM
The History of Human Space Flight by Ted Spitzmiller Highlighting men and women across the globe who have dedicated themselves to pushing the limits of space exploration, this book surveys the programs, technological advancements, medical equipment, and automated systems that have made space travel possible. This is the complete story of manned space flight. Beginning with the eighteenth-century invention of balloons that lifted early explorers into the stratosphere, Ted Spitzmiller describes how humans first came to employ lifting gasses such as hydrogen and helium. He traces the influence of nineteenth-century science fiction writers on the development of rocket science, looks at the role of rocket societies in the early twentieth century, and discusses the use of rockets in World War II warfare. Moving into the space race between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War era, Spitzmiller outlines the engineering and space medicine advances that finally enabled humans to fly beyond the earth's atmosphere. He recreates the excitement felt around the world at the first orbital flights of Yuri Gagarin and John Glenn. He recounts triumphs such as Neil Armstrong's "one small step" and tragedies such as the Challenger and Columbia disasters. The story enters the present day with the development of the International Space Station, NASA's interest in asteroids and Mars, and the emergence of China as a major player in the space arena. Spitzmiller shows the impact of space flight on human history and speculates on the future of exploration beyond our current understandings of physics and the known boundaries of time and space. - Hardcover: 624 pages
- University Press of Florida (April 26, 2017)
- ISBN-10: 0813054273
- ISBN-13: 978-0813054278
|
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 11-16-2016 09:40 AM
Description added above. |
heng44 Member Posts: 3386 From: Netherlands Registered: Nov 2001
|
posted 11-18-2016 11:46 AM
How is it possible that the cover photo is reversed, with the flag as an obvious reference? |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 11-18-2016 02:11 PM
I got in touch with UPF regarding a description of the book. According to them, they don't want to forward any information so far away from publication date. Then the picture and description appeared on Amazon. The book however is not (yet) listed on UPF website. I'll forward your remark to the person who answered my email.Edit: out of the office until 11/22. |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 11-22-2016 09:20 AM
quote: Originally posted by heng44: How is it possible that the cover photo is reversed, with the flag as an obvious reference?
From UPF: The cover photo features an astronaut with the right shoulder reversed flag, which is meant to symbolize the flag flying in the breeze, as it appears on many government uniforms, aircraft, and other equipment. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42981 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 11-22-2016 09:47 AM
It is not the direction the flag is pointing, but the arm on which it was worn.White and McDivitt had the flag sewn to the left shoulder of their spacesuits. UPF has incorrectly reversed the photo. The correct orientation can be seen here. |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 11-22-2016 10:26 AM
I've forwarded the info to UPF with a correct photo attached since it's quite an iconic one — the info will be forwarded to the appropriate folks. |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 11-22-2016 10:35 AM
Apparently, there's a new trend at NASA which consists of reversing pre-2000 photos according to an email from someone at JSC. |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 11-22-2016 10:37 AM
And someone else at NASA also pointed the following regarding the iconic nature of the photo: Particularly noteworthy on this photo/mission, since the addition of the flag to the suit occurred for the first time on Gemini IV, and specifically the flag was added because the crew was told they could not have another mission emblem (or a name for the spacecraft). The crew was going to name the spacecraft the "American Eagle" and therefore when they were told they could not use the name, they decided to go with the flag.Also the photo is noteworthy because for most of the time during the spacewalk, White kept the gas gun in his right hand, though for this image it was in his left. |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 12-30-2016 04:02 AM
Image corrected. |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 01-11-2017 07:21 AM
And we're back to square one...  |
Glint Member Posts: 1040 From: New Windsor, Maryland USA Registered: Jan 2004
|
posted 01-11-2017 10:52 AM
The image on the Amazon page is reversed. However, when you click on the "look inside" link the cover displayed has the correct image. |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 01-11-2017 11:09 AM
The image is correct on their website (make a search with the author's name). |
Blackarrow Member Posts: 3118 From: Belfast, United Kingdom Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 01-14-2017 08:49 PM
quote: Originally posted by cspg: Apparently, there's a new trend at NASA which consists of reversing pre-2000 photos...
Why? Why would anyone do such a thing? Why would anyone think such a practice could ever be correct or acceptable? It's so obviously wrong. |
David C Member Posts: 1014 From: Lausanne Registered: Apr 2012
|
posted 01-15-2017 01:22 AM
I raised an eyebrow at that as well. |
Mike Dixon Member Posts: 1397 From: Kew, Victoria, Australia Registered: May 2003
|
posted 01-15-2017 02:54 AM
You can't change history. |
Blackarrow Member Posts: 3118 From: Belfast, United Kingdom Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 01-15-2017 08:43 PM
Apparently, some people think you can reverse history. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42981 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-15-2017 09:27 PM
Before we all get up in arms, we're talking about one example, committed by a publisher, not NASA, and a claim by "someone at JSC" that the space agency is doing this too, but no examples of such. I don't doubt "someone at JSC" told Chris this was happening, but given the current lack of staffing at Johnson Space Center, I doubt anyone there is actively reversing images, let alone accessing any photos older than the current downlink from the space station. |
Blackarrow Member Posts: 3118 From: Belfast, United Kingdom Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 01-17-2017 09:04 PM
And yet... you only have to search under "lunar surface" or "Apollo" on eBay and you will find a not insignificant quantity of iconic Apollo lunar surface images which are being offered, without explanation, in "mirror-image" mode. One or more persons are definitely trying to sell reversed classic Apollo images. |
ColinBurgess Member Posts: 2031 From: Sydney, Australia Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted 01-17-2017 10:24 PM
As JL Pickering and I can attest, and presumably Ed Hengeveld as well, this is not a new phenomenon. I have countless vintage NASA photographs in my possession in which it is quite obvious that the image has been printed back-to-front in the NASA photo labs. |
heng44 Member Posts: 3386 From: Netherlands Registered: Nov 2001
|
posted 01-18-2017 12:32 PM
Correct, that is my experience too. |
Blackarrow Member Posts: 3118 From: Belfast, United Kingdom Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 01-18-2017 07:54 PM
I can understand how images might have been accidentally "reverse-printed" by under-pressure staff in NASA's press offices at busy times, but Chris referred to this as "a trend" at NASA, which implies deliberate action. If true, their actions amount to cultural vandalism and they should be identified and stopped. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42981 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-18-2017 10:47 PM
The media resource lab at Johnson Space Center, which had been responsible for providing the public and press access to the Apollo and earlier imagery, was shuttered a couple of years ago due to budget cutbacks. To my knowledge and experience, there is no one presently at JSC who has the task of actively releasing pre-space station imagery and most requests are directed to whatever existing resources are online. |
Blackarrow Member Posts: 3118 From: Belfast, United Kingdom Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 01-19-2017 08:28 PM
Point taken. Perhaps Chris could elaborate on his earlier remarks? |
cspg Member Posts: 6210 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted 01-20-2017 04:59 AM
Not much to add. University Press of Florida has corrected the image so personally the case is closed. |