Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space History Photo of the Week
  Photo of the week 1034 (August 24, 2024)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Photo of the week 1034 (August 24, 2024)
heng44
Member

Posts: 3756
From: Netherlands
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 08-24-2024 02:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for heng44   Click Here to Email heng44     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

The Solid Rocket Boosters that will help launch STS-1 are rolled out of the VAB on August 15, 1980. The crawler-transporter will carry the Mobile Launch Platform a short distance out of the VAB as part of a test to see how much the 700-ton boosters will flex under the cold-induced contraction of the external tank when fully fuelled. The broad stiffener beam connects the SRBs at the forward external tank attach point. The two hydraulic beams at the aft attach point induce bending motions, which are measured by load sensors at various points along the twin boosters.

NukeGuy
Member

Posts: 120
From: Irvine, CA USA
Registered: May 2014

posted 08-24-2024 08:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for NukeGuy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I’m wondering if these SRBs were flight articles actually used and how bending might cause gaps to form in the o-ring seals.

Axman
Member

Posts: 555
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 08-24-2024 09:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Flexing shouldn't have been, and probably wasn't a problem in o-rings. Bending might well have been a problem in structural components, hence the test. And yes, you don't test something and then use an untested component, so why wasn't it a flight article?

Stiffness and frangibility at sub-zero (untested) temperatures and conditions caused the Challenger disaster. Not bending of functional o-rings in optimal conditions.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement