Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Commercial Space - Military Space
  Michigan Upper Peninsula Spaceport

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Michigan Upper Peninsula Spaceport
SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4593
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-09-2020 11:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
An undeveloped, 3-mile stretch of land along Lake Superior, about 16 miles north of Marquette, Michigian in the Upper Peninsula, has been picked to host a vertical launch site.
Gavin Brown, executive director of the Michigan Aerospace Manufacturers Association, told the Free Press that the site could be operational in the next five or six years if plans come to fruition.
Michigan Aerospace Manufacturers Association release
Northern U.P. Identified as Top Location for Vertical Launch Spaceport

The Michigan Aerospace Manufacturers Association today announced findings from a site-selection process for a vertical space launch site that has identified a location just north of Marquette.

Conducted by spaceport consultants BRPH and Kimley-Horn, the site-selection process has been a year- long effort. Sites were ranked based on several factors, including existing commercial and public infrastructure, geographic and terrestrial mapping, living standards and workforce development. Operations are expected to begin by early 2025.

"The Upper Peninsula of Michigan is home to some of the hardest working and most resourceful people in the world," said U.S. Rep Jack Bergman, who represents the 1st District. "Locating this spaceport in the U.P. will create the opportunity for our residents to use their skills, talents and technological expertise to adapt to the changing needs of the commercial and defense space industries.

The announcement for the vertical space launch comes just months after MAMA identified the Oscoda- Wurtsmith Airport outside of Oscoda as the top candidate for a horizontal spaceport. Licensing through the Federal Aviation Administration, or FAA, has begun for that site with operations projected to begin in late 2023 or early 2024.

"This announcement is a true win for the people of the U.P.," said Sen Ed McBroom, who represents Michigan's 38th District. "We are very pleased that the U.P.'s many attributes were recognized through the vetting process. The vertical spaceport could bring quality job prospects to the region and highlight Michigan as a center for excellence and innovation."

The two launch sites in Marquette and Oscoda, along with a yet-to-be-identified command and control center, will create more than 2,000 jobs. These sites will be instrumental in creating a space ecosystem in the state that is projected to top 40,000 new jobs by 2025.

"Michigan has a real opportunity to support a space-based ecosystem," said Gavin Brown, executive director of MAMA. "The Marquette location will be a critical component, bringing low-earth orbit vertical launch capabilities to the state to meet the domestic and global demand. By integrating sophisticated infrastructure with first-rate human talent, Michigan can be one of the leaders in the space industry.

Michigan is uniquely positioned to take advantage of integrated space resources working collaboratively to serve industries like autonomous technology, automotive, communications, medical, education and first responders. Michigan will be able to meet the demand for commercial, government and defense space launches, including the demand for complete geographic broadband coverage, including 5G for electric vehicles anywhere in the United States.

In June 2019, the Michigan Legislature appropriated $2 million to assess the feasibility of developing one or more low-orbit launch sites in Michigan. In February 2020, MAMA announced the Oscoda site as the top candidate for a horizontal launch facility.

"I'm pleased the Marquette area has been chosen as a vertical space launch site and appreciate the comprehensive and thoughtful process that led to the selection," said Rep. Sara Cambensy, who represents Michigan's 109th District. "This will help bring a new industry to the U.P. and to our state that will provide good-paying jobs to our residents."

Now that the site has been selected, MAMA will work with community, local, and state partners to solicit feedback as part of the licensing process with the FAA. A command and control center analysis is currently being conducted with an expected completion date of November 2020.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 44450
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-10-2020 10:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Opposition to the selection of the site has generated more than 20,000 signatures on a change.org petition to "stop the destruction of our forests."
That anti-launch site petition has now been answered by a group supporting the effort with its own petition to "say 'YES!' to the U.P. spaceport," which had generated more than 1,600 signatures as of Saturday (Aug. 8).

SkyMan1958
Member

Posts: 911
From: CA.
Registered: Jan 2011

posted 08-10-2020 04:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SkyMan1958   Click Here to Email SkyMan1958     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm a little confused here. While I can see a sounding rocket site here, the release includes this statement, "The Marquette location will be a critical component, bringing low-earth orbit vertical launch capabilities to the state to meet the domestic and global demand."

I always assumed vertical launch was going up from the launch site, so you can have sounding rockets, or if you want to get into orbit you'd have rockets comparable to something launched out of Cape Canaveral, Mid-Atlantic, Vandenburg, etc. Rockets to orbit are multistage, with the first stage impacting maybe 200 to 400 miles downrange from the launch site.

Given the proposed launch site, downrange is Canada. I cannot imagine that the Canadians would be pleased to have rockets impacting their country and then releasing toxic chemicals into the environment. This strikes me as a no brainer way to cause friction with our great northern neighbor, without realistically much benefit.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4593
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-10-2020 05:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Reusable launch systems may mitigate some of those concerns.

NukeGuy
Member

Posts: 60
From: Irvine, CA USA
Registered: May 2014

posted 08-11-2020 01:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NukeGuy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What advantage is gained from launching from the UP of Michigan? Sounds like some politicians and politically connected commercial interests trying to cash in.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4593
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-11-2020 03:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
High inclination/polar orbit insertion.

David C
Member

Posts: 1134
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 08-11-2020 03:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Not really. This sounds like a bad idea.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4593
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-11-2020 08:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wouldn't discount that the Canadians have been consulted and are also potentially receptive to a partnership on the facility. Corridors to the north are sparsely populated and there is (from Canada's perspective) utility in having another option to put sensors and comms aloft to address northern coverage gaps not satisfied by geostationary assets.

David C
Member

Posts: 1134
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 08-12-2020 01:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well the Canadians had better have been consulted before Michigan effectively starts bombing them! Once again the FAA's licensing process is brought into question.

Coverage gaps? They don't require Michigan to be filled. I'm all for private enterprise, but with current technology this looks like an inappropriate site. Very high reliability SpaceX style flyback would change that, but it would have to be very high reliability. "Sparsely populated" isn't the point. Canada isn't Kazakhstan and 2023 isn't the Cold War. If they were Americans' homes on a live bombing range, how impressed do you think Uncle Sam would be?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 44450
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-12-2020 01:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As noted in the press release, the FAA has not yet licensed the site to become a spaceport. An environmental impact report will be part of that process, which will consider the adverse effects to surrounding areas.

At this point, the Michigan Upper Peninsula is only a proposal for such a facility.

Cozmosis22
Member

Posts: 1026
From: Texas * Earth
Registered: Apr 2011

posted 08-12-2020 10:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Cozmosis22     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If they launch vertically out over Lake Superior toward the northeast, which they obviously intend to do; there would be about 150 nautical miles of open water between Marquette and Canada. That looks like a safe plan and see no reason why this enterprise should be held up by imaginary concerns.

David C
Member

Posts: 1134
From: Lausanne
Registered: Apr 2012

posted 08-12-2020 12:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for David C     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
150 nm is no where near enough. Why do you think the Eastern and Western Test Ranges are located where they are, and why do they have the azimuth limitations they do?

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement