|
Author
|
Topic: Asteroid on track for possible Mars hit
|
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 17121 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 20, 2007 08:44 PM
LA Times: Asteroid on track for possible Mars hit quote: An asteroid similar to the one that flattened forests in Siberia in 1908 could plow into Mars next month, scientists said Thursday.Researchers attached to NASA's Near-Earth Object Program, who sometimes jokingly call themselves the Solar System Defense Team, have been tracking the asteroid since its discovery in late November. The scientists, based at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge, put the chances that it will hit the Red Planet on Jan. 30 at about 1 in 75. A 1-in-75 shot is "wildly unusual," said Steve Chesley, an astronomer with the Near-Earth Object office, which routinely tracks about 5,000 objects in Earth's neighborhood. "We're used to dealing with odds like one-in-a-million," Chesley said. "Something with a one-in-a-hundred chance makes us sit up straight in our chairs."
|
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 20, 2007 09:00 PM
Great thing from an observational perspective provided it doesn't disturb Spirit and Opportunity... their cameras along with MRO could provide some exciting data and pretty stunning views of the impact and its after effects...1:75 ain't good betting odds though. ------------------ Scott Schneeweis http://www.SPACEAHOLIC.com/ |
MCroft04 Member Posts: 759 From: Smithfield, Me, USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted December 20, 2007 09:03 PM
So 1 in 100 is significant? Should we (or Martians in this case) be worried? To put it in perspective; as one who has drilled exploratory oil and gas wells with a 1 in 10 chance of success and been disappointed many times, I don't get too excited about a 1 in 100 chance. On the other hand the potential impact (no pun intended) is quite great. I guess this just amplifies the need to improve our predictive capabilities in tracking celestial bodies. |
Philip Member Posts: 3902 From: Brussels, BELGIUM Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted December 21, 2007 05:41 AM
At those odds it won't happen I guess.  Probably invisible from Earth: Mars to get an asteroid impact? |
Max Q Member Posts: 240 From: Whyalla South Australia Registered: Mar 2007
|
posted December 21, 2007 06:43 AM
What can I say, please god let it hit. |
Rodina Member Posts: 835 From: Lafayette, CA Registered: Oct 2001
|
posted December 21, 2007 09:01 AM
It's about time Mars got the smacking around it deserved. |
Lunar rock nut Member Posts: 487 From: Oklahoma city, Oklahoma U.S.A. Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted December 21, 2007 09:28 AM
Earlier this year around Feb 21st NEO object 2007 (Dn41). We had a close call that was hardly even mentioned. A hefty chunk of rock passed us within the lunar orbital distance 0.08 LD roughly 200,000 mi. If the one mentioned in this thread hits Mars I will expect Tom, Joel and especially Scott S. with that big scope of his will provide us with unforgettable images. Might be a wake up call for NEO funding opposition to get a first hand look at such an event with all of the eyes we currently have on Mars. If such a large impact occurs would it have implications for the Phoenix project. Also lifting kilotons of dust into the atmosphere during the martian winter might do in the rovers.Terry |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 17121 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 21, 2007 09:33 AM
quote: Originally posted by Lunar rock nut: If this one hits Mars I will expect Tom, Joel and especially Scott S. with that big scope of his will provide us with unforgettable images.
Note that in the link that Philip provided to BadAstronomy.com, Phil Plaitt writes: quote: My gut feeling is that an explosion of that size wouldn’t be visible from Earth even with big 'scopes, but I'll need to do some math to figure it out.
It would be a shame if true, as it would be an opportunity (no pun intended) wasted. When Shoemaker-Levy 9 plunged into Jupiter, it was perhaps the largest worldwide star party in recent history (if not ever). |
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 21, 2007 09:54 AM
Couldn't happen at a better time, with Mars opposition only taking place a month earlier the planet will still be pretty close... for the non-astronomer types on the forum, Mars is readily apparent in the evening sky (it's that bright red object rising at sunset and nearly directly overhead at midnight). |
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 21, 2007 10:29 AM
quote: My gut feeling is that an explosion of that size wouldn’t be visible from Earth even with big 'scopes, but I'll need to do some math to figure it out.
Well here is something for Plaitt to chew on as he does his calculations... according to Sandia National Labs, computer modeling shows the Tunguska event was generated by an object much smaller then initially thought. |
tegwilym Member Posts: 1912 From: Renton, WA USA Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted December 21, 2007 11:42 AM
quote: Originally posted by Lunar rock nut: If the one mentioned in this thread hits Mars I will expect Tom, Joel and especially Scott S. with that big scope of his will provide us with unforgettable images.
I'd sure give it my best shot! It kind of cleared a bit last night and I tried some Mars imaging. It sure looks nice and big on the screen, but by the time I was ready to really start some good imaging, the clouds came over again. Arrggh!!It's been about 2 months, 5+ inches of rain, some snow, and lots of wind since I last used the observatory. I guess this was just a little taunt from the weather demons I guess. The joys of being a Seattle Astronomer!  Tom |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 17121 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 21, 2007 11:48 AM
quote: Originally posted by LCDR Scott Schneeweis: ...the Tunguska event was generated by an object much smaller then initially thought.
Regardless the size of the impactor, are there calculations that show that the Tunguska event would have been visible from Mars? |
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 21, 2007 11:59 AM
Dont know but the analogy being used in the initial announcement was that the 160 foot asteroid strike on Mars would yield a "Tunguska like event"...presumably that prediction did not take into account the recent Sandia modeling... if the results of the modeling are correct, the actual kinetics may generate an impact orders of magnitude larger then Tunguska which would be visible. |
mdmyer Member Posts: 855 From: Humboldt KS USA Registered: Dec 2003
|
posted December 21, 2007 02:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by tegwilym: I'd sure give it my best shot! It kind of cleared a bit last night and I tried some Mars imaging.
I have been working a 4pm to midnight shift and when I got off work at midnight last night I rolled my 20" Starmaster out and I observed Mars for about an hour. I had some great views at 375x and 500x. It was crips in those moments of steady seeing. At times the sky was more steady that usual last night. Mike Myer Humboldt KS |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 17121 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 21, 2007 02:48 PM
NASA release quote: Astronomers Monitor Asteroid to Pass Near MarsAstronomers funded by NASA are monitoring the trajectory of an asteroid estimated to be 164-feet wide that is expected to cross Mars' orbital path early next year. Observations provided by the astronomers and analyzed by NASA's Near-Earth Object Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., indicate the object may pass within 30,000 miles of Mars at about 6 a.m. EST on Jan. 30, 2008. "Right now asteroid 2007 WD5 is about half-way between the Earth and Mars and closing the distance at a speed of about 27,900 miles per hour," said Don Yeomans, manager of the Near Earth Object Office at JPL. "Over the next five weeks, we hope to gather more information from observatories so we can further refine the asteroid's trajectory." NASA detects and tracks asteroids and comets passing close to Earth. The Near Earth Object Observation Program, commonly called "Spaceguard," plots the orbits of these objects to determine if any could be potentially hazardous to our planet. Asteroid 2007 WD5 was first discovered on Nov. 20, 2007, by the NASA-funded Catalina Sky Survey and put on a "watch list" because its orbit passes near the Earth. Further observations from both the NASA-funded Spacewatch at Kitt Peak, Ariz., and the Magdalena Ridge Observatory in New Mexico gave scientists enough data to determine that the asteroid was not a danger to Earth, but could potentially impact Mars. This makes it a member of an interesting class of small objects that are both Near Earth Objects and “Mars crossers." Because of current uncertainties about the asteroid's exact orbit, there is a 1-in-75 chance of 2007 WD5 impacting Mars. If this unlikely event were to occur, it would be somewhere within a broad swath across the planet north of where the Opportunity rover is. "We estimate such impacts occur on Mars every thousand years or so," said Steve Chesley, a scientist at JPL. "If 2007 WD5 were to thump Mars on Jan. 30, we calculate it would hit at about 30,000 miles per hour and might create a crater more than half-a-mile wide." The Mars Rover Opportunity is currently exploring a crater approximately this size. Such a collision could release about three megatons of energy. Scientists believe an event of comparable magnitude occurred here on Earth in 1908 in Tunguska, Siberia, but no crater was created. The object was disintegrated by Earth’s thicker atmosphere before it hit the ground, although the air blast devastated a large area of unpopulated forest.
|
cspg Member Posts: 2059 From: Geneva, Switzerland Registered: May 2006
|
posted December 22, 2007 12:39 AM
quote: Originally posted by Max Q: What can I say, please god let it hit.
Ouch! Why so much anger?Don't offend Mars (God of War), the asteroid might well swing by the planet and be redirected towards us! Chris. |
Lunar rock nut Member Posts: 487 From: Oklahoma city, Oklahoma U.S.A. Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted December 22, 2007 07:43 AM
quote: Originally posted by Robert Pearlman: Regardless the size of the impactor, are there calculations that show that the Tunguska event would have been visible from Mars?
From what I have read on Tunguska in the past it was more likely an impactor of cometary origin. All hypothesis have been based on forensic type research due to the lack of witnesses. The Sikote Alin event of 1947 had witnesses from up to 200 mi away not able to look directly at the entry event due to being brighter than the sun and reporting feeling heat from those distances. If the impact area faces earth at the time, I would believe it will be seen given ideal observing conditions. Recently an impact was video recorded on the moon from the earth. It is an excellent video clip to watch considering it was a very small object. I don't remember details of the estimated size. The energy release was quite bright. Terry |
MCroft04 Member Posts: 759 From: Smithfield, Me, USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted December 22, 2007 06:03 PM
quote: Originally posted by Lunar rock nut: From what I have read on Tunguska in the past it was more likely an impactor of cometary origin.
I recently read "The Tunguska Fireball" (2005) by Surendra Verma which reviews proposed theories for the Tunguska event, which inlcude comets, meteorites, matter anti-matter, gas explosion from deep volcanic vents, and even a laser strike from ET's. He claims that there is still no agreement among scientists as to the cause of the event. By the way, I think that little sparkle on the picture of the lunar surface from your post may be the sun reflecting off Jack Schmitt's geology hammer. |
Max Q Member Posts: 240 From: Whyalla South Australia Registered: Mar 2007
|
posted December 22, 2007 06:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by cspg: Don't offend Mars (God of War), the asteroid might well swing by the planet and be redirected towards us!
Just the thought of an event like this with all the technology on Mars at the moment the images should be spectacular. Oh and just in case, Sorry Mars God of War forgive this humble blasphemer.  |
Philip Member Posts: 3902 From: Brussels, BELGIUM Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted December 24, 2007 09:51 AM
The discoverers' images.
|
Lunar rock nut Member Posts: 487 From: Oklahoma city, Oklahoma U.S.A. Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted December 25, 2007 07:06 AM
As I stated earlier I couldn't remember the details of the lunar impact image above or where I saved it from. Phillip with his savvy internet prowess discovered the origin. Special thanks to Phillip!Terry |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 17121 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 28, 2007 03:08 PM
NASA/JPL release quote: Mars Impact Probability Increases to 4 PercentThe impact probability for a collision of asteroid 2007 WD5 with Mars on January 30 has increased from 1.3% to 3.9%. Pre-discovery observations of asteroid 2007 WD5, taken on November 8, 2007 have allowed its orbit to be refined and the uncertainties for the late January Mars encounter have been improved. The impact probability resulting from the recent orbit refinement has increased to a surprising 3.9% (about 1 in 25 odds). The uncertainty region during the Mars encounter now extends over 400,000 km along a very narrow ellipsoid that is only 600 km wide. Since the uncertainty region intersects Mars itself, a Mars impact is still possible. However, the most likely scenario is that additional observations of the asteroid will allow the uncertainty region to shrink so that a Mars impact is ruled out. In the unlikely event of an impact, the time would be 2008 January 30 at 10:56 UT (2:56 a.m. PST) with an uncertainty of a few minutes.
|
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 28, 2007 05:17 PM
quote: Originally posted by Robert Pearlman: In the unlikely event of an impact, the time would be 2008 January 30 at 10:56 UT (2:56 a.m. PST) with an uncertainty of a few minutes.
With due respect to European cS members who would love to get a crack at viewing the impact if it does take place, the impact time couldn't be better; the big scopes on the west coast and Hawaii will be optimally positioned to capture and we in the U.S. will have a respectable shot at seeing as well... |
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted December 31, 2007 07:10 AM
There is a very interesting thread ongoing on the YahooGroup Minor Planet Mailing List (MPML) - most of the individuals/organizations responsible for generating predictions of a strike by the asteroid (2007 WD5) are collaborating via this group. The thread discusses some of the challenges of making the prediction has well as resolving ambiguities from observational data received in the past month. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 17121 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted January 03, 2008 09:45 AM
JPL update as of January 2: quote: With new observations taken Dec. 29, Dec. 31 and Jan. 2 by the Magdalena Ridge Observatory in New Mexico, scientists at NASA's Near-Earth Object Program Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., have updated their trajectory estimates for the asteroid. Based on this latest analysis, the odds for the asteroid impacting Mars on Jan. 30 are now about 1-in-28, or 3.6 percent. New Mexico Tech operates the Magdalena Ridge Observatory.
|
Scott Member Posts: 3149 From: Houston, TX Registered: May 2001
|
posted January 03, 2008 11:26 AM
Scott,I joined that email group and the posts are very interesting. Thanks for the link. I see some mention of "clones" in recent posts (as I understand it, "clones" are smaller close-by objects which may impact Mars even if the main object misses it). Are these known to exist with certainty for this asteroid - or is their existence a theoretical prediction? Can't wait until January 30th! Scott |
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted January 03, 2008 04:58 PM
Scott - In this case the term "clones" is being applied to alternate orbital intercept points of the same object with variance based on inputting slightly different values for the asteroids orbital elements (to account for tracking ambiguity). The clones are then overlayed against the track of Mars to yield a dispersion plot (an example of which can be seen here). This helps graphically depict probability of impact. |
Scott Member Posts: 3149 From: Houston, TX Registered: May 2001
|
posted January 03, 2008 05:22 PM
Oh, I see. I had seen a similar dispersion plot but I didn't realize "clones" referred to those dots. Thanks for your help, Scott! |
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted January 07, 2008 07:55 AM
Calculation circulating on the MPML this morning reflect an improved/growing probability of impact to 4.97% (close to 1 in 20) |
Scott Member Posts: 3149 From: Houston, TX Registered: May 2001
|
posted January 07, 2008 08:54 AM
 |
tegwilym Member Posts: 1912 From: Renton, WA USA Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted January 07, 2008 11:58 AM
We won't have a chance to see anything here in Seattle. I haven't seen the sky in months here. Arrrgghh!!!!New H-alpha filter, and camera that has hardly been used. *sigh* Tom -Frustrated astronomer |
LCDR Scott Schneeweis Member Posts: 1593 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted January 07, 2008 03:11 PM
quote: Originally posted by tegwilym: New H-alpha filter, and camera that has hardly been used.
Guaranteed cloud magnets for sure... you should know better!! |
Blackarrow Member Posts: 1209 From: BELFAST, UNITED KINGDOM Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted January 07, 2008 07:31 PM
quote: Originally posted by LCDR Scott Schneeweis: (close to 1 in 20)
You wouldn't bet the ranch on a 1 in 20 chance... but you wouldn't buy a house with a 1 in 20 chance of collapsing, would you? Depends on how you look at it. One thing's for sure - if it was Earth rather than Mars, a lot of people would be soiling their trousers and the media would be in a frenzy. Remember Skylab? |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 17121 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted January 10, 2008 12:28 AM
NASA/JPL release quote: 2007 WD5 Mars Collision Effectively Ruled Out - Impact Odds now 1 in 10,000Since our last update, we have received numerous tracking measurements of asteroid 2007 WD5 from four different observatories. These new data have led to a significant reduction in the position uncertainties during the asteroid's close approach to Mars on Jan. 30, 2008. As a result, the impact probability has dropped dramatically, to approximately 0.01% or 1 in 10,000 odds, effectively ruling out the possible collision with Mars. Our best estimate now is that 2007 WD5 will pass about 26,000 km from the planet's center (about 7 Mars radii from the surface) at around 12:00 UTC (4:00 am PST) on Jan. 30th. With 99.7% confidence, the pass should be no closer than 4000 km from the surface.
|
Lunar rock nut Member Posts: 487 From: Oklahoma city, Oklahoma U.S.A. Registered: Feb 2007
|
posted January 10, 2008 06:34 AM
Sigh.Terry |
MCroft04 Member Posts: 759 From: Smithfield, Me, USA Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted January 11, 2008 07:31 AM
I can only imagine how the public would have reacted if this Asteroid had been hurtling towards the earth instead if Mars. Initial reports cited a 1 in 75 chance of impact, then 1 in 25, then 1 in 20. I suspect at this time there would been much concern here on old earth, possibly even panic. Then we're told, there is really only a 1 in 10,000 chance. Wonder how a predominately non science public would react the next time an impact prediction was made? I don't want to be critical of NASA's sharing of information, but unfortunately it could lead to loss in credibility (been there seen that). |
Philip Member Posts: 3902 From: Brussels, BELGIUM Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted January 11, 2008 12:22 PM
Well, there's TU24 heading to Earth, but a collision will NOT take place.
|