Author
|
Topic: 'One small step': Scripted or ad-libbed
|
kr4mula Member Posts: 642 From: Cinci, OH Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted 01-03-2013 06:45 AM
A renewed "controversy" over Neil Armstrong's first words after stepping on the moon has been the subject of some discussion on local (Cincinnati) radio and newspaper. Apparently Armstrong's brother says that Neil came up with the words ahead of time and even shared them with him.This article from the Cincinnati Enquirer spells it out. For a while upon returning to Earth, Armstrong intimated that he just thought the line up spontaneously. Later, he said he had had time to think about what to say in the hours between landing on the moon and stepping down the ladder. Years later, ever the mystery, he seemed to suggest that perhaps he spent time crafting the line before launch.Now, Dean Armstrong, Neil’s younger brother, says Neil knew exactly what he would say well before takeoff. In an interview with the BBC, Dean says that one evening, while playing the board game Risk, Neil handed Dean the line that he was planning to say. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 43576 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-03-2013 06:46 AM
collectSPACE Neil Armstrong's first words on the moon: one small fib or giant leap by brother?Were Neil Armstrong's historic first words spoken on the moon pre-scripted or, as the late astronaut long held, ad-libbed on the spot? Armstrong, on becoming the first person to step foot onto another planetary body on July 20, 1969, radioed back to Earth, "That's one small step for (a) man, one giant leap for mankind." His quote instantly became a part of history. (The "a" wasn't audible in the broadcast but the astronaut said — and a 2006 audio analysis supported — that he did indeed speak the word.) Since returning to Earth four decades ago and up until his death last year, Armstrong maintained that he did not give any thought to what he would say while on the moon until after he safely landed the Apollo 11 lunar module "Eagle" at Tranquility Base. But a new interview with his brother suggests Armstrong's "small step" quip was not a "giant leap" at improvisation... (Additional discussion of this topic can be found under the thread for the BBC Two documentary for which Dean Armstrong was interviewed.) |
moorouge Member Posts: 2458 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 01-03-2013 07:27 AM
The 2006 audio analysis is most certainly an interesting read and quite persuasive. However, the author rather takes the edge off it when right at the end he says that the tongue, lip and throat formations needed to produce the wave are those of an 'ah' not an 'a'. So, to my mind, the analysis remains persuasive but not conclusive.As with most data analysis, if one examines it with an assumption that you will find what you're looking for, you will nearly always find it. As an example of this one has only to remember the audio tapes from Dealey Plaza which some have claimed show multiple gunshots and multiple locations or those who are keen to advocate man-made climate change from analysis of the statistics. |
Rusty B Member Posts: 239 From: Sacramento, CA Registered: Oct 2004
|
posted 01-03-2013 01:11 PM
From a Youngstown Vindicator - Jul 21, 1969 newspaper interview of Neil's parents and neighbors about his first words spoken on the moon:"We had no idea what he would say, I think it was great," Mrs. Armstrong said. |
Rusty B Member Posts: 239 From: Sacramento, CA Registered: Oct 2004
|
posted 01-03-2013 01:27 PM
"First Words From The Moon? Who Knows"Article from The Tuscaloosa News - Jun 30, 1969, speculating about what the first words spoken on the moon by Armstrong would be. |
Hart Sastrowardoyo Member Posts: 3446 From: Toms River, NJ Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 01-03-2013 05:32 PM
If Dean's account is correct, then he is contradicting his brother, who told James Hansen (in "First Man") that he spent no time thinking about what he would say until after he landed on the moon. Armstrong's first wife Janet, as well as his crewmates, also told Hansen that they had no idea what Armstrong would say and that he did not discuss it with them. Actually, both are wrong. Neil's first words were, "Good luck, Mr. Gorsky." |
Jay Chladek Member Posts: 2272 From: Bellevue, NE, USA Registered: Aug 2007
|
posted 01-03-2013 08:48 PM
Please don't start with that Gorsky joke. Its pretty old and stale (and kind of dumb, although yes it is funny in its perverted way).The way Neil spoke his words when he stepped off the footpad and considering it sounded sort of monotone, it wouldn't surprise me in the least to know that Neil had either written the words down somewhere to see how they sounded if he read them out loud or at least gone over them in his head. The tone in which they were spoken didn't sound spontaneous like his words regarding the LM footpads, the appearance of the lunar soil and the length of the LM strut just before he stepped off. Neil was a thoughtful guy and I've no doubt he put more than just a spontaneous thought into those words in the seconds he was standing on the footpad. Every engineer knows sometimes you have to put things down on paper, especially if you want to check the math (or in this case, the vocabulary). Neil being engineering minded and not one for small talk probably tackled the problem in an engineering sort of way so he was prepared because he kept getting hounded by people on the topic leading up to the flight and he wanted it taken care of (cross off that part of the checklist as it were). But regardless of if he came up with that phrase while on Earth or on the lunar surface, he still came up with it himself and nobody else did it for him. The rest is just arguing semantics. If his brother is indeed telling the truth, more power to him. Anyone who has a sibling knows that sometimes you can have a unique bond with one member of your family that you don't quite have with even other members of the family and sometimes you share some pretty deep secrets with them that you won't with anyone else. |
spaceman1953 Member Posts: 953 From: South Bend, IN Registered: Apr 2002
|
posted 01-03-2013 09:53 PM
I can never, ever get tired of seeing that picture of Neil and Hansen together. "I" always wanted to be the "official biographer" but never told anyone that! HA!And if I ever ran into Neil's brother Dean on the street, he would have to tell me who he was, because I sure do not see a family resemblance. The very first time I was in Wapakoneta, Ohio in 1969, and I made my parents drive me over to 912 Neil Armstrong Drive to "check it out" and when we were back by the garage and a man (no doubt Neil's father) was moving the trash can around... boy, did I ever want to do my FIRST dumpster diving that day, before the word was invented! Like my brother always said, "Speed, if you were rich, they would call you 'eccentric' but since you are poor, they just call you 'crazy.'" |
schnappsicle Member Posts: 396 From: Houston, TX, USA Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted 01-04-2013 10:15 AM
To me the most significant thing about the story is that Neil had time to play Risk before going to the moon. From everything I read, the crew could have used a few more months of training, but decided to go anyway because the risk of being over-prepared was a greater risk at that point.Like everyone else, I see no difference when he came up with his line. The important thing is it's the perfect line for the moment. Since we're on the topic, I was wondering if anyone knows what Neil's heart rate was at the moment he stepped off the LM. I know mine was highly elevated. I can only imagine what Neil's must have been. Perhaps his high heart rate contributed to his monotone voice as he took his first step. Of course, that's pure speculation, but I'd think he would have wanted to get the words out exactly right. The pressure to do something that precise with that many people watching and listening must have been excruciating, even for Neil. |
Rick Member Posts: 379 From: Yadkinville, NC Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 01-04-2013 10:43 AM
I have always maintained that Neil NEVER spoke the phrase "one small step for a man," and that he immediately caught his slip. I believe that could very well be the reason for the slight pause and also for the tone in his voice, almost as if he was doing a Homer Simpson "dooooh" head slap. |
mikepf Member Posts: 444 From: San Jose, California, USA Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 01-04-2013 11:45 AM
The link to this story on the Yahoo News page the other day was headed "Neil Armstrong Lied." It pretty well ticked me off. I guess Yahoo thinks there just isn't enough negativity in the news these days. |
p51 Member Posts: 1658 From: Olympia, WA Registered: Sep 2011
|
posted 01-04-2013 12:13 PM
Does it really matter if he made it up on the spot or weeks before? Haven't we overshadowed the act of going there with something really trivial like when he thought to say that line?Frankly, Aldrin saying, "Contact" was probably the first word spoken on the Moon, so I've never understood why the "one small step" line was such a big deal... |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 43576 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-04-2013 12:39 PM
The point, if there is one, is that Armstrong himself said clearly and repeatedly that he did not give thought to his first words until he was on the moon. Achieving the landing was much more important in his mind.His brother has now contradicted that account. The quote is among the most famous words ever recorded by history, hence the increased interest. |
Rusty B Member Posts: 239 From: Sacramento, CA Registered: Oct 2004
|
posted 01-04-2013 01:13 PM
The story I cited above from, June 30, 1969, shows that there was public speculation about what would be said. With possibly a billion people waiting to hear those words, there had to be tremendous pressure to come up with something good. Armstrong had to have thought about what he was going to say ahead of time, who wouldn't have? |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 43576 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-04-2013 01:28 PM
First words wouldn't matter if the landing didn't proceed safely. It would seem a greater priority to focus on the task at hand and leave what to say to the hours he would have after the pressure was lifted. First things first, as they were...Besides, Armstrong never seemed very much concerned with what other people thought about him or his activities. There are numerous examples of his ignoring societal pressure. |
schnappsicle Member Posts: 396 From: Houston, TX, USA Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted 01-04-2013 01:34 PM
quote: Originally posted by p51: Frankly, Aldrin saying, "Contact" was probably the first word spoken on the Moon, so I've never understood why the "one small step" line was such a big deal...
From the things I've read, you are correct. "Contact" was the first word spoken after the the first lunar landing. What makes Armstrong's quote so historic is that his are the first words spoken by a man actually standing on the surface of the moon. Perhaps you don't see the difference, but to the rest of us, there is a significant and profound difference. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 43576 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-04-2013 01:51 PM
Which raises an interesting point: if we ignore for a moment Dean Armstrong's account and go only by what Neil Armstrong said, then he put more importance (or at least planning) into the words spoken upon landing on the moon than he did stepping onto the moon.Though it was a well-kept secret at the time, he sought permission to name the landing site "Tranquility Base." And based on his statements about taking more pride in the landing than the first step, Armstrong may have considered his call out, "Houston, Tranquility Base here, the Eagle has landed," as more historic than his "small step" quote. |
mjanovec Member Posts: 3811 From: Midwest, USA Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted 01-04-2013 02:36 PM
quote: Originally posted by Robert Pearlman: Which raises an interesting point: if we ignore for a moment Dean Armstrong's account and go only by what Neil Armstrong said, then he put more importance (or at least planning) into the words spoken upon landing on the moon than he did stepping onto the moon.
I think it's very plausible that this is the case. Landing on the moon was the more difficult accomplishment than walking on the moon. And as a pilot, Armstrong would naturally place more emphasis on flying the LM (and landing it successfully) than he would on walking on the lunar surface. |
Paul78zephyr Member Posts: 678 From: Hudson, MA Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted 01-04-2013 08:10 PM
Wow, Dean sure looks alot like Neil. Does anyone know of any pictures of the two of them together?Assuming that Neil Armstrong came up with those words himself, and I have no reason to believe he did not, then why does it even matter when he thought of them? |
Paul78zephyr Member Posts: 678 From: Hudson, MA Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted 01-04-2013 08:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by schnappsicle: "Contact" was the first word spoken after the the first lunar landing.
Actually to focus on the first 'word' spoken on the moon (Contact) would be like focusing on Neil Armstrong's first word from the surface (That's). Aldrin's first wordS from the moon (which directly preceded Armstrong's famous pronouncement): Contact light. Okay Engine Stop. ACA out of Detent. Mode Control, both Auto. Descent Engine Command Override, Off. Engine Arm, Off. 413 is in. |
328KF Member Posts: 1251 From: Registered: Apr 2008
|
posted 01-04-2013 10:16 PM
quote: Originally posted by Robert Pearlman: Though it was a well-kept secret at the time, he sought permission to name the landing site "Tranquility Base." And based on his statements about taking more pride in the landing than the first step, Armstrong may have considered his call out, "Houston, Tranquility Base here, the Eagle has landed," as more historic than his "small step" quote.
I'd like to expand on Robert's point a bit. According to multiple sources, Armstrong took great care to keep his planned announcement of the landing site name secret. According to Andy Chaikin's book: For the landing, Armstrong gave some though to quotes; before the flight he and Aldrin decided that if they reached the lunar surface they would use the call sign "Tranquility Base"--"base" to connote exploration. They told only Charlie Duke, lest the first words from the moon take him by surprise--"Say again, Apollo 11?" And when it finally happened, Armstrong found himself adding quite spontaneously, "The Eagle has landed." So even though it was planned and only known by a few, it didn't go off without a hitch. (Duke initially responded with "Roger Twang...") Now if Armstrong had a fully prepared and planned statement ready for his first step, doesn't logic follow that he would have shared that with, at the very least, Capcom Bruce McCandless? It seems that if he were concerned with getting it correct or not having anyone ruin it for history by talking over him, he would have taken equal precautions.Armstrong was a unique person, as has been well documented. As a pilot, he saw a landing as the historic moment, not the step off of the vehicle which he landed, regardless of where he landed it. Many other famous and lesser pilots likely understand this. Did Orville Wright or Lindbergh or Yeager make a planned statement after stepping out of their flying machines? No, but they didn't have a live TV audience of millions waiting to hear what they had to say, either (Lindbergh was quoted as saying simply, "Well, I made it," when the crowds reached his aircraft). Armstrong was fully aware of this, yet for all of these decades the memories of everyone close to Armstrong and the mission have agreed... he did not have a formal statement prepared. I think it is a little late to start rewriting history now, or perhaps too early, based upon one 40+ year old recollection. Thinking toward the future, I hope that the next person to step on the moon, or an asteroid, or Mars, is equally spontaneous. I often found the prepared and read remarks following shuttle landings to pretty long-winded. I know there will be pressure, and probably more so in that he or she will have to follow up Neil's quote. But I would leave it to the person to find something appropriate, rather than it going through some approval process at NASA HQ. And if that astronaut wants to run it by me in advance, I promise I'll never tell anyone. |
mikepf Member Posts: 444 From: San Jose, California, USA Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 01-04-2013 11:56 PM
I just read a reply about all this by Andrew Chaikin on Space.com. I give a great big THANK YOU Mr Chaikin, for standing up for Neil now that he is not here to respond to all the headlines calling him a liar. I don't know who came up with the term "lamestream media", but it is certainly appropriate in this case. I must say that I am a bit surprised by the lack of the offense about this that I, and Mr Chaikin, seem to have felt over this. |
moorouge Member Posts: 2458 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 01-05-2013 07:40 AM
I wonder if there would be all this controversy if he'd said something really memorable, like "It IS cheese - Caerphilly!" |
Lou Chinal Member Posts: 1332 From: Staten Island, NY Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted 01-05-2013 11:54 AM
I side with the camp that says; "Houston, Tranquility Base here, the Eagle has landed."That is what Neil would have thought about, the landing, not the walk. |
schnappsicle Member Posts: 396 From: Houston, TX, USA Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted 01-07-2013 06:39 AM
quote: Originally posted by 328KF: Now if Armstrong had a fully prepared and planned statement ready for his first step, doesn't logic follow that he would have shared that with, at the very least, Capcom Bruce McCandless?
The answer to that would seem to be a logical "No". In the few minutes before the landing, Deke Slayton tapped Charlie Duke on the shoulder and told him to be vewwy vewwy quiet. The greater logic tells me that McCandless, knowing the historic implications of the moment would also have wanted to remain quiet and let Armstrong do the talking. Also, Neil went on a 90 second detailed description of the lunar surface after coming down the ladder and before putting the first boot print on the lunar surface, which I'm sure the people in the back room would have wanted to hear, giving McCandless even greater impetus to remain silent.Basically, it seems to me that throughout the history of Mercury, Gemini and Apollo, the Capcoms knew the seriousness of each moment and were respectful of the men who were putting their lives on the line in the name of exploration. None more important than the first lunar landing. |
robsouth Member Posts: 769 From: West Midlands, UK Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted 01-07-2013 08:18 AM
As Alan Shepard descended the LM ladder, McCandless said, 'Not bad for an old man', it would appear that he wasn't always that serious when on capcom duty. |
dom Member Posts: 866 From: Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 01-07-2013 11:45 AM
quote: Originally posted by Paul78zephyr: Assuming that Neil Armstrong came up with those words himself, and I have no reason to believe he did not, then why does it even matter when he thought of them?
Exactly. This really would only be a big issue if it turned out the phrase was written by some NASA PR person and handed to Armstrong on a piece of paper just before the flight! |
onesmallstep Member Posts: 1313 From: Staten Island, New York USA Registered: Nov 2007
|
posted 05-14-2014 05:50 PM
Echoing some of the other posts, yes, it does seem redundant analyzing the grammar of Armstrong's first words as he stepped on the moon. But at the same time, it speaks to our fascination with an historic event. It isn't the first — and probably won't be the last — time famous words have been parsed over: the phrase "Now he belongs to the ages...", allegedly uttered by Secretary of War Edwin Stanton after Abraham Lincoln's death, was deemed incorrect and the more likely "Now he belongs to the angels..." was accepted at first. But the first phrase is now deemed more "historic."As for Armstrong preparing in advance the words he would say on the surface; he mentioned in a 2001 NASA oral history interview conducted by historian David Brinkley that he received no guidance or requests from NASA headquarters, and thanked Julian Scheer, an administrator in charge of public affairs at the time, for keeping a 'hands off' policy. Ironically, it was Scheer who helped compose the wording on the equally famous plaque left behind on the LM Eagle, even going so far as to reject a suggestion (request?) from President Nixon to include God in the phrasing. |
Jim_Voce Member Posts: 273 From: Registered: Jul 2016
|
posted 10-30-2018 08:43 AM
Does anyone know if Armstrong received help in choosing his first words on the Moon?Editor's note: Threads merged. |
Rick Mulheirn Member Posts: 4208 From: England Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 10-30-2018 09:46 AM
Of late I have subscribed to the notion that in the weeks and months prior to the flight Neil mused about what he might say... as he stepped out on to the lunar surface and had perhaps several possible quotes in mind. It was not until after he landed that he then settled on one.That would explain both Dean's comments and Neil's: that he had not decided in advance what he was going to say when the moment came. |
YankeeClipper Member Posts: 622 From: Dublin, Ireland Registered: Mar 2011
|
posted 10-31-2018 07:17 AM
One of Neil Armstrong's closest childhood friends, retired physician Dr. Konstantine "Kotcho" Solacoff MD, offers an interesting insight in Andrew Smith's 2009 BBC documentary Being Neil Armstrong. About 8 minutes in, Smith asks if Armstrong ever talked to Solacoff about where the historic 'One small step' words came from. This is Solacoff's answer:Well, yeah, he did tell me, but then he said other stuff too and so I don't know which one is true, cause I ask him about it.He did say he did not think about it until he was on his way to the Moon. He did not have that ahead... We used to play... when you were younger did you ever play 'Mother, May I?' ? You know, you take one step - 'Mother, may I?' - 'Yes you may, or no you may not', or you can take a giant step. And that kind of came to his mind and he thought, 'Gee, you know I can say a giant step, small step, you know, and kind of put those two together'. And it came from that game that we used to play as little kids. Part of me privately wonders whether he was subconsciously reminded of this by the physical construction of the LM ladder and its series of small steps followed by one big step from the bottom rung. |
Blackarrow Member Posts: 3160 From: Belfast, United Kingdom Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 10-31-2018 08:50 AM
I also remember that contribution in "Being Neil Armstrong." In retrospect, it's not difficult to see the obvious juxtaposition of a "small step" from the LM ladder and a "giant leap" for the whole species. It's a textbook example of antithesis. I see no reason why, for instance, Neil Armstrong couldn't have playfully written down the words "small step" and "giant leap" on a piece of paper to show his brother while not actually deciding the precise words until the landing had succeeded,thus reserving his right to think of something different or better, but having that notion of "small step/giant leap" to come to and flesh out a bit.I certainly don't think anyone lied. There is almost certainly an element of misunderstanding or misremembering, not lying. |
moorouge Member Posts: 2458 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 10-31-2018 09:21 AM
Famous and historic words whether with an "a" or whether without an "a". However, I wonder what history would have made of the occasion if his first words had been, "B****y hell - it is cheese!"I can imagine Conrad saying that if he'd been first. |
YankeeClipper Member Posts: 622 From: Dublin, Ireland Registered: Mar 2011
|
posted 11-01-2018 12:43 PM
Given Neil Armstrong's propensity for careful, measured thought and words, I too subscribe to the idea that he gave his possible first words on the lunar surface some advance consideration.Dean and Neil Armstrong's recollections may both be correct, if one believes the current special edition of New Scientist magazine on the subject of memory. In the article, we learn that memory is a malleable, adaptable, perishable illusion and that there are significant individual differences in recollection based on brain connectivity, emotional responses to events, attention levels, and recall cues. People who are good at recalling facts and logical reasoning have more connections between the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. People with rich autobiographical memories have more connections between the hippocampus and visual processing centers. Given the high priority demands and cognitive task load on Neil before the mission, he may genuinely not have recalled a relatively brief discussion of possible first words. Whereas Dean indicated he was surprised and pleased by what Neil had written and may, therefore, have had a more emotional response to what would have been a novel, important, and memorable revelation by Neil. The presence or absence of recall cues may have affected later memory retrieval. An interesting example of this phenomenon is Neil and Buzz's individual recollections of the moments immediately after the nerve-wracking Apollo 11 landing. Aldrin remembered the two men looked at each other, and he patted Armstrong on the shoulder. Armstrong recalled the two shook hands. Two astronauts, who shared the same experience, recalling different aspects of that momentous event. |
moorouge Member Posts: 2458 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 11-03-2018 03:03 AM
As was said in another thread, the truth is whatever you want it to be. |
oly Member Posts: 971 From: Perth, Western Australia Registered: Apr 2015
|
posted 11-03-2018 04:30 AM
It can also be subjective, what the courts place as the highest level of evidence, that gained by eye witness, is considered to be the lowest level by science, where hard evidence trumps what you think you see or hear. The paradox here is that written evidence can't refute spoken word unless the note written by Neil and shown to his brother turns up signed and dated by Neil himself. |
YankeeClipper Member Posts: 622 From: Dublin, Ireland Registered: Mar 2011
|
posted 11-03-2018 02:41 PM
Al Reinert's November 1984 TexasMonthly article Tiptoeing On the Ocean of Storms offers some interesting insights on individual memories:If you went around and visited the 24 men who have been to the moon and you reminisced with them about their expeditions, you would be surprised at how differently each one remembers the experience. Not so much the technical details — though the voluminous scientific and engineering data gathered were closely monitored and are well recorded, the men who went have largely forgotten all that.What sticks in their minds after fifteen years is whatever impressed them personally, uniquely. Associate Professor of Psychology, Jennifer Talarico, cautions those who witness historic events that flashbulb memories of dramatic events aren’t as accurate as believed, while other researchers advise that the "photo-taking impairment effect" might even hinder our ability to experience and remember an event fully.All of which raise interesting questions about how astronauts and observers should best prepare for, experience, document, and preserve future historic events on Earth, in space, on the moon and, eventually, on Mars. An old adage counsels that a blunt pencil is better than a sharp mind! |
oly Member Posts: 971 From: Perth, Western Australia Registered: Apr 2015
|
posted 11-04-2018 06:43 PM
This interview transcript with Neil Armstrong gives an insight into his thoughts about the Apollo 11 mission following Apollo 8. And Armstrong talks about remembering things in this post Gemini mission interview.
|