Author
|
Topic: Opinions on Edgar Mitchell signatures
|
moorouge Member Posts: 2454 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 05-21-2016 12:57 PM
Opinions please on these Edgar Mitchell signatures -
|
JasonIUP Member Posts: 282 From: PA Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 05-21-2016 03:07 PM
Unusual, and would probably fail some authentications, but I think they're good.I should add that, for the reasons above, I wouldn't recommend buying them, however. Mitchell is cheap enough to find "normal" example of; maybe buy those instead. |
moorouge Member Posts: 2454 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 05-22-2016 03:11 AM
Thanks for that. However, if they are genuine but atypical it would make them rarer and more valuable would it not? |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 05-22-2016 04:00 AM
If the provenance accompanying the atypical signature was ironclad and the reason for the autograph being that way had an exceptional history, then perhaps it would command a premium, but in most cases, signature styles that divert from the norm are seen as a detraction, not an asset. |
moonnut Member Posts: 248 From: Andover, MN Registered: Apr 2013
|
posted 05-22-2016 09:38 PM
I concur with Robert. Atypical generally doesn't add value but decreases it. An example would be Alan Shepard signed items. Would you want a nice, clean full signature or an Ashep? I would assume atypical sigs are your rushed or in the heat of the moment quick sign and goes. No care or consideration put into it, unlike a more carefully crafted signature. |
moorouge Member Posts: 2454 From: U.K. Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted 05-28-2016 01:22 AM
Again many thanks for the input. So where does it leave this - |
JasonB Member Posts: 1091 From: Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted 06-02-2016 08:10 AM
Regardless of authenticity, that would have been better off left unsigned. Sometimes I wonder when I see autographed items: - Who collects this?
- What did the astronaut think when someone handed them that to sign?
|