|
|
Author
|
Topic: Questions about NASA photos and patches
|
idrvball Member Posts: 150 From: Burke, VA USA Registered: Mar 2009
|
posted 03-08-2009 08:49 AM
I collect autographs, and in my quest, came across a number of NASA photos and other space related that I was wondering if someone could enlighten me on. As for the NASA photos. Some have the blue or purple press release on the back, and some don't. Is there a difference of where the picture came from. Some of the early pictures without the press release have the A Kodak Paper marking on the back. But, for the Apollo 12, they have a GAF marking. I know they are all from the time period of early Apollo to Apollo 12, because of the collection they came from. Also, I have three things that I am hoping someone could tell me about them. One is a Flag on the Beta Material. The material is about 7x8 inches, with the flag about 4x6.25 inches. The other is the NASA Logo on the Beta Material. It is about 6x7, with the NASA logo about 3 inches or so in diameter. The final appears to me to be a swatch of a space suit that has 14 different layers. Most of the layers are silver foil with the top being beta cloth. It is about 3x5.5. Any information for a rookie would be appreciated. Thanks, Mike |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 03-08-2009 03:28 PM
Mike,Beta cloth emblems like the ones you have are quite collectible. The US flag was distributed in quite large quantities but remains very popular. An example in good condition rarely sells for less than $40. Nasa meatball logos are not as common and probably worth at least a similar amount. The spacesuit sample is an interesting piece and definitely collectible. I'll leave it to a spacesuit expert to tell you more. Vintage photos can be pretty valuable these days but it depends on a lot of things. Shots taken on the missions themselves are generally very sought-after. Color shots are worth more than b/w. A KODAK PAPER watermark dates the image and makes it valuable. The GAF watermark is similar but not so well known and may throw some buyers. Although press release text on the back is nice it doesn't necessarily boost the value of a print. The most valuable pictures are those that are famous, or those that are simply impressive photographs (in terms of composition and imagery). Shots taken pre or post mission are of interest mostly to space fans rather than photographic art collectors and don't generally sell for big money. |
idrvball Member Posts: 150 From: Burke, VA USA Registered: Mar 2009
|
posted 03-09-2009 01:19 AM
Thanks for that information. Maybe you could answer this question for me. The ones that have the press markings on the back. With regard to Apollo 11, I have one that is that iconic photo of Aldrin on the moon. It has the date 7/20/69 date on it. Does that mean this photo was actually from that date. I put scans of those two up here. Thanks again, I really do appreciate the information. Mike |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 03-09-2009 02:06 AM
Thats just the date the picture was taken. The only thing that dates the print itself is the watermark on the paper.The single line "A KODAK PAPER" watermark was produced between about 1965 and 1972, which makes NASA prints on this paper contemporary with the Gemini and Apollo missions. They can therefore be considered vintage. This particular image is one of the most famous photographs of all time so a vintage NASA print of it is very collectible. A version with the image printed as a square in the center of the paper and with the NASA id imprinted in the upper border would probably be worth more but yours is still valuable. If you put it on eBay I'd expect it to fetch anywhere from $150 to $500. The prices do vary wildly. | |
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
|
|
|
advertisement
|