Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Stamps & Covers
  Space Cover 618: Shaba launch site

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Space Cover 618: Shaba launch site
Antoni RIGO
Member

Posts: 228
From: Palma de Mallorca, Is. Baleares - SPAIN
Registered: Aug 2013

posted 08-14-2021 03:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Antoni RIGO   Click Here to Email Antoni RIGO     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Space Cover of the Week, Week 618 (Aug. 15, 2021)

Space Cover 618: Shaba launch site

In December 1975, OTRAG (Orbital Transport-und-Raketen Aktiengesellschaft, Germany) signed an agreement with currently Democratic Republic of Congo (then named Republic of Zaire 1971-1997) to develop a low-cost rocket known as OTRAG.

Shaba launch site, also Shaba North (in Katanga region), and less noted Kapani Tonneo, was a simple launch base with a pad and primitive launch support which has been an antique landing site for British transports.

Just three launches took place in Shaba; first succeeded in May 18, 1977 and last in Jun 5, 1978. Shaba was closed because other nations as USSR and France pressured the local governments to cancel the permission of launching rocket to Germany.

Cover above pictured refers to this first launch and is cancelled with a red OTRAG meter from Stuttgart over a Spacelab German stamp.

Other two Shaba launches were also commemorated by other covers as pictured below, same illustration but different red meter (Neu-Isenburg).

For years I was looking for other covers from this launch site but just theses were found.

Please, if anyone has some different covers from Shaba, it would be nice to post images and share with others. Thanks.

eurospace
Member

Posts: 2659
From: Berlin, Germany
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 09-10-2021 05:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for eurospace   Click Here to Email eurospace     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Antonio, astrophilatelic covers should usually carry the postal cancellation of the post office nearest to the launch site. This is clearly not the case. Those covers were postmarked in Germany, probably near the administrative headquarters of Otrag. Sorry to be smartassing about our famous collector friend, the late Peter Wilhelm, but this is then not an astrophilatelic cancellation.

Now I certainly do not ridicule the challenge to get covers postmarked at a remote Congolese location.

Stuttgart is in Germany, the capital of Baden-Württemberg. Neu-Isenburg is somewhere else, just south of Frankfurt. I know the area well, I grew up two towns further down the road. Neu-Isenburg is also the hometown of Thomas Reiter. He was made honorary citizen of Neu-Isenburg. But that has nothing to do with Otrag, however you look at it.

Antoni RIGO
Member

Posts: 228
From: Palma de Mallorca, Is. Baleares - SPAIN
Registered: Aug 2013

posted 09-11-2021 06:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Antoni RIGO   Click Here to Email Antoni RIGO     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Jürgen, I am absolutely agree with you. Space covers allowed in Astrophilately class should be cancelled by the post office at the place and on the exact date of the special events (Astro Regulations, Article 3. Principles of Exhibit Composition, Point 3) and the covers shown above do not seem to meet this double condition, place and date.

However, I invite you to join me to make a deeper reading of the Astro Guidelines to see if these covers are, or not, appropriate to be enclosed in Astrophilately class.

Special cancellations for anniversaries of space events should be avoided except when no original event cancellation is available.

(Astro Guidelines, Article 3. Principles of Exhibit Composition, Point 3.2.3).

Red meter OTRAG (rocketry organisation) from Stuttgart and Neu-Isenburg is a special cancellation shown when no original event cancellation have been seen along the years. Under this point, these covers are perfectly valid to be shown in Astrophilately class. They are not gems, they are not the best covers, but it is all that exists.

Furthermore, we can also read:

For different national space programmes the national mission control centres are responsible. Postmarks from tracking sites participating in the mission may be shown as a supplement.

(Astro Guidelines, Article 3. Principles of Exhibit Composition, European Space Programmes, Point 3.3.15).

Under this point, OTRAG rockets were a national Germany space programme and if OTRAG headquarters or factories were located in Stuttgart and/or Neu-Isenburg, these covers are perfectly valid to be shown in Astrophilately class. Again, they are not gems, they are not the best covers, but it is all that exists.

Additionally, we should consider when these covers were created. In 1977-78 no Astro Regulations/Guidelines were actives. Our predecessor astrocollectors created space covers according your best criteria and common sense. Astrophilately Regulations and Guidelines were born in Rome in 1985. So, these space covers were made before this date.

For sure, if we could come-back in the time, with the current Astrophilately Regulations/Guidelines on the hands we, or those collectors, would make different covers for this space event. Maybe, we would send the covers through Germany Embassy in Kinshasa to get the postmark from nearest post office, or from some local dealer or better yet, through some German engineer/scientist moved to Shaba to assist the rocket launch.

In summary, meanwhile no better space cover exist, these covers postmarked in Stuttgart and/or Neu-Isenburg are, in my opinion, absolutely valid to be shown in Astrophilately class.

If, in the future, space covers cancelled near Shaba launch site would appear, then these space covers lose its condition and would pass to be considered as supplementary space covers. Otherwise, avoid these kind of covers just to attend current Astro Regulations/Guidelines would mean that no astrophilatelic evidence would exist to mark these launches.

Of course, I respect others and their opinions. It is mine, based on arguments above described.

Finally, thanks Jürgen for the note about astronaut Thomas Reiter is honorary citizen of Neu-Isenburg.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2021 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement