Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Stamps & Covers
  Space Cover 488: Tracing back rare cancels

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Space Cover 488: Tracing back rare cancels
Eddie Bizub
Member

Posts: 81
From: Kissimmee, FL USA
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 10-21-2018 10:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eddie Bizub   Click Here to Email Eddie Bizub     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Space Cover of the Week, Week 488 (October 21, 2018)

Space Cover #488: How do rare cancels come about?

Did you ever come across a rather common cover but notice there is a different cancel than you are used to seeing? If so, did you ever try to figure out where the uncommon cancel came from? For this week's Space Cover of the Week, the answer to the mystery is right there if you look close enough.

Apollo 10 was launched May 18, 1969 in a full dress rehearsal for the upcoming attempt to land Apollo 11 on the moon. The mission was a great success and splashed down May 26, 1969. The prime recovery ship was USS Princeton. All went smoothly with the recovery and hundreds of covers were postmarked on board USS Princeton on the recovery date. The great majority of covers received a machine cancel.

The first cover pictured is the common cover that is seen everywhere. This particular cover was also signed by the Commanding Officer. There were however at least a couple of covers that received a very rare hand cancel. The second cover pictured is one of those rare covers.

If you look closely at the cover, there is a partial machine cancel. My guess is that the postal clerk spotted this cover with a partial cancel and proceeded to cancel it again with the hand cancel so that the collector would receive the cover with a complete date and ship's name. A simple gesture that creates a very rare cover.

I previously had a second Apollo 10 recovery cover with a USS Princeton hand cancel. It was a #10 envelope with no hint of a machine cancel. My guess is that it never received a machine cancel or because it was a #10 envelope the postal clerk just cancelled it with a hand cancel.

Does anyone else have any very common covers with a very rare cancel? Did you try to solve the mystery of why the cover received the rare cancel? Let us know!

NAAmodel#240
Member

Posts: 312
From: Boston, Mass.
Registered: Jun 2005

posted 10-21-2018 11:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for NAAmodel#240   Click Here to Email NAAmodel#240     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In the case of Apollo 10 an enlisted sailor named Howard Korth brought 50 number 10 envelopes to the postal unit on board the ship. His were cancelled with the larger Hand Cancel. I’m not sure whether he knowingly requested this.

There are other instances where the crew was aware that a postmark was unusual. In the case of GT-2, an officer writing to his girlfriend shared that the Machine Cancel was special and worth saving.

Ross
Member

Posts: 472
From: Australia
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 10-22-2018 08:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ross   Click Here to Email Ross     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Great info David. Below is a scan of the #10 envelope with a clear hand cancel that you provided for my site.

Eddie Bizub
Member

Posts: 81
From: Kissimmee, FL USA
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 10-22-2018 06:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eddie Bizub   Click Here to Email Eddie Bizub     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's another cover mystery with a possible explanation.

Going back maybe 30 years, my dad and I came across a Gemini 9 cover with a Space Craft Covers cachet. These covers are only seen with Cape Canaveral or Patrick AFB machine cancels. This particular cover had a Kennedy Space Center machine cancel! This predates all known Space Craft Covers with KSC cancels by more than a year and a half. How did this cover come to be?

Our guess is that either Joe Fitzpatrick or a friend sent for a Gemini 9 launch cover from KSC. When it came back, it did not have the official KSC-NASA cachet on it. No hint of it at all on the cover. We think it was simply thrown in with the regular SCC print run so that it received a cachet. After all, adding one more cover to a print run really doesn't cost you anything.

We don't know for sure if that is the explanation but it is sure plausible. I wish I had bought the cover but the dealer wanted way too much money for it at the time.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement