|
|
Author
|
Topic: Apollo 14 microfilm: flown to the surface?
|
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 3411 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 06-10-2009 07:24 AM
I acquired this large lucite globe with a 2 inch piece of microfilm some time ago. It was originally part of a larger display and is one of 100 pieces of film carried by Alan Shepard. It's not clear whether it went to the surface — does anyone know? |
rjurek349 Member Posts: 1215 From: Northwest Indiana Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 06-11-2009 08:01 PM
These Alan Shepard-carried microfilm lucites of the first page of the first issue of the Christian Science Monitor are, indeed, very sweet pieces. I own one in my collection as well. They are some of the very few artifacts carried by Shepard to the moon that a collector can acquire. I have researched these pieces too, and have discussed them with key folks at the Christian Science Monitor, including their head librarian. According to my correspondence with her, and their official records, a member of Third Church of Christ, Scientist, in Houston, Texas, who was a Monitor advertising representative and a friend of Louise Shepard, wife of the astronaut, asked Alan Shepard if he would be willing to take a microfilm copy of The Christian Science Monitor into space with him. Shepard agreed; in fact, according to the Monitor, he was already committed to taking the front pages of two other newspapers as well. My correspondence with The Monitor also states that according to their records, they provided Shepard with "a 35mm film can containing a microfilm of the entire first issue, from November 25, 1908, as well as one hundred microfilm copies of the front page of this issue," and they possess several examples of the microfilmed front pages in their archival collection. The 35mm film strip is Kodak film, as I can read it clearly from inside my lucite as well. Given that Shepard took 100, and they hold "several" copies in their archives -- there are less than 100 of those lucites available to the public. It is a very small population, especially when you consider that probably a few of them did not survive over the years (breakage, disposition, etc.). I have also researched these on Newspaperarchives.com, and according to press reports at the time, it was suspected that Shepard took the microfilm newspapers to the surface -- the question, from a couple of the editors, was whether or not he left them there or not. While there is certainly a chance they did fly to the surface, given the press reports at the time, that fact can only be established conclusively with more research. In response to my specific question on whether or not there was any indication in the Monitor's records that they flew to the surface, The Monitor's records do not contain any clear indication whether they reached the surface or -- only that they did indeed "got to the moon" with Shepard. If anyone else has any information on these lucites, I'd love to hear more as well, as I continue to research this subject, too. |
Larry McGlynn Member Posts: 1338 From: Boston, MA Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted 06-11-2009 10:51 PM
Did the CSM actually say "one can" of 35mm film? |
rjurek349 Member Posts: 1215 From: Northwest Indiana Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 06-11-2009 11:37 PM
Yep - direct quote. |
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 3411 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 06-12-2009 04:08 AM
Thanks for putting it into context, Rich. Not as simple as I thought! |
Ken Havekotte Member Posts: 3245 From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 06-12-2009 05:19 AM
The actual flown microfilm clips from the first page of The Christian Science Monitor, indeed, are prized artifacts from the Apollo lunar program and relate to Shepard himself. I know, somewhere in my vast space journalism files, there is a story or two about them as well. I'll do my best to research the paper file cabinets as time permits.You might want to contact, if still living, aerospace journalist Elaine Stone. She covered most of the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo spaceflight missions reporting for Religious News Service and possibly did a piece or two for The Christian Science Monitor. Shepard also carried the first newspaper to the moon on Feb. 5, 1971. It was a 24-page special keepsake edition of Florida's "Today" Space Age newspaper published in July 1969. It has always been my understanding, Rich (and please correct me if I am wrong), that the actual newspaper copy was left on the lunar surface, as I read once and/or was told by Florida Today officials long ago. Have you done any research on this topic? If not, and if you're interested, let me see what I can dig up over here. |
rjurek349 Member Posts: 1215 From: Northwest Indiana Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 06-12-2009 07:04 AM
Ken, thanks for the tip and the info. Yes, Florida Today is, indeed, one of the papers mentioned in the articles that circulated at the time as being taken with Shepard... so it is hard to say that FT was/is the first newspaper taken to the moon, given the CSM sent not only the 100, but also a full copy of the first edition. If Shepard did leave the copy of FT on the moon -- and as mentioned, some of the quotes in the articles at the time suggest that was their understanding but did not know for sure -- it might seem logical that Shepard would also leave the full issue of the CSM, and bring back the 100 copies. But that is pure speculation on my part at this time. I'll hunt down my copies of those newspaper clippings this weekend and look for the exact quotes/comments. If you find any more details in your clippings, that would be great, too! |
rjurek349 Member Posts: 1215 From: Northwest Indiana Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 06-12-2009 10:50 AM
Ken, I reviewed the papers in my archive. It was widely confirmed that Shepard took microfilm copies of three newspapers with him: Cocoa Today (rather than Florida Today, my mistake), The Houston Post, and the Christian Science Monitor. Bently, the editor of Cocoa Today, is widely quoted as saying that he had "no doubt" that Shepard was leaving the microfilm on the moon, as the other articles were reporting uncertainty over whether or not he was bringing them back from the moon. It is also reported that the Post and CSM were also under the impression that the full editions (in the case of the post, just seven historic first pages on microfilm) would be left on the moon - but couldn't confirm. With the above reporting, there is a reasonably good chance these are surface flown, although still, at this point, not conclusive. | |
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 2021 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
|
|
|
advertisement
|