Author
|
Topic: NASA's Ranger lunar imagery program (1961-1965)
|
Fra Mauro Member Posts: 1587 From: Bethpage, N.Y. Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 11-15-2012 07:01 AM
Was Project Ranger worth the cost and effort, in light of six failures in nine missions? I just read the official NASA history and there was substantial criticism of the program at the time. |
Apollo-Soyuz Member Posts: 1205 From: Shady Side, Md Registered: Sep 2004
|
posted 11-15-2012 10:31 AM
I think some of the criticism about the program resulted from the necessity to sterilize the spacecraft. If you remember, the Ranger's were to deposit a seismometer on the moon thus the necessity of the sterilization. What the project did not know at the time, the sterilization process was affecting the electronics of the spacecraft. The management of the Ranger program was also criticized for its handling of the program. |
Fra Mauro Member Posts: 1587 From: Bethpage, N.Y. Registered: Jul 2002
|
posted 11-15-2012 10:48 AM
Also, with the Lunar Orbiter program on the way, scientists didn't see much values in a probe that didn't carry anything in the way of experiments. |
ilbasso Member Posts: 1522 From: Greensboro, NC USA Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted 11-15-2012 11:29 AM
If nothing else, Ranger gave us practice in navigating from the Earth to the Moon and aiming at specific targets. It wasn't many years before Ranger that some of our initial Moon shots missed the Moon altogether.We also learned that the cratering on the Moon's regolith was such that it appeared the same as you approached the surface. That is, any given frame of TV imagery on the way down showed the same kind of mix of large and small craters, at any scale of the image. |
Jay Gallentine Member Posts: 287 From: Shorewood, MN, USA Registered: Sep 2004
|
posted 11-15-2012 09:48 PM
Six failures in nine missions had everything to do with NASA and JPL learning how to run a program together - as well as learning how to build a spacecraft.Two very different management philosophies and design approaches were simultaneously in play. Don't forget the development issues. Ranger pioneered a whole host of technologies - from three-axis stabilization to lunar rough-landing to live TV from the moon. Nearly all of it had to be worked out from scratch. I'd have to say yes, it was worth the cost and effort. If anything, it was a good lesson in communication and leaping before you looked! |