Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Free Space
  Alternate history: Moon instead of shuttle

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Alternate history: Moon instead of shuttle
Paul78zephyr
Member

Posts: 675
From: Hudson, MA
Registered: Jul 2005

posted 01-14-2010 11:03 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Paul78zephyr     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If all the money that was ever spent on the space shuttle program and all that was associated with it since its earliest beginnings had been spent on a moon base (and all that would be associated with that) where would we be today?

ilbasso
Member

Posts: 1522
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Registered: Feb 2006

posted 01-14-2010 11:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ilbasso   Click Here to Email ilbasso     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In bounding the answer to the question, does "all that was associated with it" include the International Space Station, Hubble launch and repair missions, launch of Galileo and Magellan planetary probes, etc.?

I think your question is, "How much of a moon base would we have been able to build for the money?" But another question to ask is, "What would have been the scientific (and technical capabilities) returns of building a moon base vs. what we have learned and the capabilities we have developed by flying the Shuttle and the missions it supported?"

Paul78zephyr
Member

Posts: 675
From: Hudson, MA
Registered: Jul 2005

posted 01-14-2010 12:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Paul78zephyr     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I should have been a bit more specific to include ISS but perhaps not the planetary missions. But I'm open to everyone's answers based on their own interpretation of my originally vague question.

tegwilym
Member

Posts: 2331
From: Sturgeon Bay, WI
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 01-14-2010 01:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tegwilym   Click Here to Email tegwilym     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The monolith would have been found in 2001!

moorouge
Member

Posts: 2454
From: U.K.
Registered: Jul 2009

posted 01-14-2010 02:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for moorouge   Click Here to Email moorouge     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bearing in mind the waning public support at the end of the Apollo programme I think that one has to consider how much the American taxpayer would have been prepared to sanction the building of a Moon base. The answer, I suspect, is that they wouldn't and NASA would have shrunk even further, fighting tooth and nail to keep even its planetary programmes going.

The other question to ask is - without the constraint of public opinion to hold them back, would the Russians have gone ahead with a Moon base?

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement