Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Stamps & Covers
  USNS Vanguard: official ship cachet or not?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   USNS Vanguard: official ship cachet or not?
Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 3827
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 06-21-2024 05:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Came across this nicely cachet cover for the Apollo 12 lunar landing at the Cape. To the best of my recollection, I can't recall ever seeing it before. Maybe some of our Navy recovery/tracking ship guys and/or specialists can shed more light on it.

The cachet artwork does remind me of a prominent cachet maker, also, note the abbreviations of "ITT-FEC" and "MSTS" which I believe are of three aerospace contractor firms along with "AFWTR," with the later referring to the Air Force Western Test Range. It would appear the USNS Vanguard tracking ship might had been on station off the coast of California at the time during the second lunar landing mission.

The black cachet cover, "In Support of Apollo 12" seems a bit unusual, therefore, was it exclusively produced by the Vanguard ship crew or was it just another commercial cachet cover?

Axman
Member

Posts: 480
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 06-22-2024 04:27 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
USNS Vanguard was the only tracking ship used by NASA for the Apollo missions post Apollo 11. And all the evidence I have would deny Vanguard being on station in the Western Test Range for the Apollo 12 launch.

It was then no longer a Primary tracking ship, but had a reduced role as a secondary tracking ship providing tracking, telemetry and communications relay during the immediate post launch and orbital insertion phase of the Apollo flights 12 through to Apollo 17. The ship was on station south east of Bermuda for all six flights. There was no post office aboard, and the majority of the missions have return to port dates close to splashdown dates.

Specifically for the Apollo 12 mission I have seen the same cachet as you show with Cape Canaveral dates of 19th November (moon landing), and 24th November (splashdown), which would suggest an earlier than usual return to port date soon after liftoff.

Whether it was an official ship's cachet I cannot tell you. USNS Vanguard cachets in my possession for missions 4, 8,10, and 13 through to 17 had a completely different design than the Apollo 12 one, and were more or less uniform for those eight missions.

As for the abbreviations in the diamond, I believe they are a kind of potted history of the USNS Vanguard from when it was designated T-AGM-19:

  • ITT-FEC = ITT Federal Electric Corporation, who I believe fitted out the Muscle Shoals (later Vanguard), Johnston and Flagstaff (later Mercury and Redstone) at the General Dynamics Quincy Shipbuilding Division in 1965. It was also ITT-FEC who after the first Apollo mission, replaced the ships' long haul high frequency (HF) radio by Super High Frequency (SHF) satellite communications.

  • DOD-NASA = are Department of Defense/ National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

  • MSTS = Military Sea Transportation Service (U.S. Navy) who took possession of the newly named Vanguard in 1966.

  • AFWTR = is as stated by Ken, the Air Force Western Test Range where Vanguard was first placed on active station in 1967.
I quote her service history below directly from my source notes:
Vanguard was floated out of dock on 9 September 1965 and completed builder's trials in January 1966. She was accepted by MSTS on 28 February 1966 and was expected to enter service in June 1966 following instrumentation testing at Quincy. She was accepted at the Eastern Test Range on 11 October 1966 and was then transferred to the Western Test Range on 17 March 1967, although she ended up serving in the Atlantic."

Vanguard was concerned primarily with the insertion of the space vehicle into earth orbit and was to be stationed in the North Atlantic."

The ships had different roles in the Apollo program. Vanguard was concerned primarily with the insertion of the space vehicle into earth orbit and was to be stationed in the North Atlantic. Redstone and Mercury were to be stationed in the Indian Ocean near South Africa and in the Pacific between the Canberra and Hawaii tracking stations to monitor the injection of the vehicle into the lunar trajectory for its flight to the moon. The first of these ships to participate in the Apollo program was Vanguard, which supported Apollo 4 (launched on 9 November 1967) as a tracking and communication platform for insertion/injection in the mid-Atlantic.

Redstone and Watertown[?] made their initial appearance in January 1968 in support of Apollo 5, the former in the Atlantic and the latter in the Pacific. They played the same roles in support of Apollo 6 in April 1968. For the first manned flight, Apollo 7, Vanguard was positioned near the Bahamas to support orbital insertion, Redstone was stationed in the central Pacific, Mercury was positioned east of Taiwan, and Huntsville was 1,200 miles west of Los Angeles to support reentry. The same four ships supported Apollo 8, Apollo 9, and Apollo 11, with Vanguard in the Atlantic and the other three in the Pacific."

After Apollo 11 NASA kept Vanguard on station in the Atlantic for the remaining Apollo flights as a secondary tracking station but released the others, stating that the success of the previous flights made it possible to reduce the number of tracking areas.

Ross
Member

Posts: 560
From: Australia
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 06-23-2024 08:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ross   Click Here to Email Ross     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Excellent summary. I agree with all your points.

The only observation I would make is that I have several USNS Vanguard covers from Apollo 12 and all of them have this cachet. I've haven't seen any other cachet. If someone has a different one please show it.

I am therefore tending to think it was a ship's cachet for the mission.

Ken Havekotte
Member

Posts: 3827
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 06-23-2024 10:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ken Havekotte   Click Here to Email Ken Havekotte     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That's a good history, Alan, of the USNS Vanguard Apollo Instrumentation Ship that had been assigned to support NASA on the Atlantic side from 1966-80.

For Ross, when I saw this cachet cover for the Vanguard, it came with a collection I was examining last week that included several other Vanguard ship covers that had the standard red circular rubber stamp cachet with Cape cancels for other Apollo and Skylab missions. I thought for sure one was for Apollo 12, therefore, I am hoping to see the cover collection again for a better look. Apparently it had been owned by a TAGM-19 ship worker of the Military Sea Transportation Service (MSTS) it would seem.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement